GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Nulogy Quality & Compliance (AuditComply)

Nulogy describes Quality & Compliance software for audits, inspections, corrective actions and controlled documents, with mobile offline evidence capture.

THE DOCUMENTED SCOPE

What the current evidence describes.

Source-attributed capabilities and limits. Inspect the full record before drawing a conclusion.

vendor asserted

Nulogy announced its acquisition of AuditComply on October 14, 2025. Scope: vendor corporate history; no complete legacy product or license parity is established.

Inspect the evidence ↘

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Use the current Nulogy quality-and-compliance workflow as the scope while retaining the AuditComply history. The acquisition announcement and present product documentation support that context; they do not prove that every legacy module, contract or operating procedure has stayed unchanged. Distinguish an audit finding from an accepted corrective action and its supporting document revision.

What this record does not establish

Current product descriptions and the 2025 acquisition announcement do not establish complete legacy feature, support, migration or license parity. The failed support-center capture is excluded. No certification, compliance or manufacturing outcome is independently established.

2 current sources · 2 published assertions
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗
A

A test worth running

Create a fictional inspection with a revised document, one non-conformance and an unresolved corrective action. Demonstrate the selected offline capture and synchronization path, retain reviewer ownership, and export the records. Ask another reviewer to reconstruct which evidence supported closure without relying on a live dashboard.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

B

Evidence to bring back

  1. A current-versus-legacy module and migration responsibility statement.
  2. An export preserving inspection evidence, document revisions and an unresolved corrective action.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

01
vendor asserted

Nulogy announced its acquisition of AuditComply on October 14, 2025. Scope: vendor corporate history; no complete legacy product or license parity is established.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceNulogy — AuditComply acquisition announcement ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-16 · Reviewed 2026-10-16 · current until 2026-11-15

Artifact SHA-256: cf53291669b52a4f3e2fe769741fd51d23bd9340a0d5b115f4d7702165fd6f22

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

02
vendor asserted

Nulogy describes Quality & Compliance software for audits, inspections, corrective actions and controlled documents, with mobile offline evidence capture. Scope: primary documentation only; no independent product test or compliance determination.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceNulogy — current Quality & Compliance product ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-16 · Reviewed 2026-10-16 · current until 2026-11-15

Artifact SHA-256: 696186ad83d50c4d609594a319ad8f702e74be36dec832a016cc0ceccf5c3c44

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

Nulogy — AuditComply acquisition announcement ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-16
Nulogy — current Quality & Compliance product ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-16
Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

01

Can you provide a current-versus-legacy module and migration responsibility statement for the selected configuration?

02

Can you provide an export preserving inspection evidence, document revisions and an unresolved corrective action for the selected configuration?

03

Which exact version, entitlements, data paths and responsible roles apply?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗