GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

ComplyCloud

ComplyCloud presents software for managing compliance work and documentation.

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Separate generated documentation from an implemented operational process. A questionnaire can produce a tailored document while the organization still lacks the owner, data inventory or recurring task needed to act on it. Identify what the software does and which interpretation or decision belongs to your responsible specialists.

What this record does not establish

Exact privacy, security and AI-governance modules, advisory involvement and jurisdiction-specific obligations require confirmation; no legal compliance determination is made.

2 current sources · 3 published assertions
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗
A

A test worth running

Use fictional supplier and data-flow details to produce a draft document and recurring task. Change a material answer, inspect the revision and assign the resulting work. Export the document history, vendor relationship and unfinished tasks; ask the receiving owner to explain what remains unresolved.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

B

Evidence to bring back

  1. A questionnaire-to-document revision record with reviewed assumptions.
  2. An exported task and vendor-flow register with accountable roles.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

01
vendor asserted

The official ComplyCloud-to-Cerivo transition page describes ISO 27001 support from gap analysis toward ISMS readiness. This is workflow support under a changed brand, not a statement that ComplyCloud, Cerivo or a customer holds an ISO 27001 certificate.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceComplyCloud — Product capabilities and published scope ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-11-03 · Reviewed 2026-11-03 · current until 2026-12-03

Artifact SHA-256: 663222e83368c17b8e9ff25761d700976c64692394082e24182d055bfc3375d7

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

02
vendor asserted

Cerivo's official ComplyCloud transition page says ComplyCloud is now Cerivo and that existing customers retain their login, legal documentation and agreement. It points to GDPR records, DPA and data-subject-request workflows. This documents vendor-stated continuity, not universal migration terms or a customer's compliance outcome.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceComplyCloud — Product capabilities and published scope ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-11-03 · Reviewed 2026-11-03 · current until 2026-12-03

Artifact SHA-256: 663222e83368c17b8e9ff25761d700976c64692394082e24182d055bfc3375d7

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

03
vendor asserted

ComplyCloud presents software for managing compliance work and documentation. Scope: vendor documentation only; this is not an independent product test or compliance determination.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceComplyCloud — current official product scope ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-16 · Reviewed 2026-10-16 · current until 2026-11-15

Artifact SHA-256: e8f6bb53a719d478e3ac6dd8a314d4f82fe5c170b5d0399f93aa6615662a8fce

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

ComplyCloud — current official product scope ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-11-03
Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

01

A questionnaire-to-document revision record with reviewed assumptions. Can this be demonstrated and exported in the selected configuration?

02

An exported task and vendor-flow register with accountable roles. Can this be demonstrated and exported in the selected configuration?

03

What roles, modules, version and retained-copy boundaries apply at exit?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

COMPLIANCE / CLAIMS, SCOPE & GAPS

Start with the requirement.
Inspect the support.

Prepare your vendor review ↗

These labels describe this dossier’s current evidence coverage. A published mention may be a framework mapping, a qualified assertion or a limitation; it is not a compliance finding.

GDPR

Published mention available

EU personal data protection

Customer compliance workflow support

Confirm the contracted entity, current product/module and migration obligations. This dossier retains the legacy product identity and does not create a duplicate listing.

Read the source-attributed statement

Cerivo's official ComplyCloud transition page says ComplyCloud is now Cerivo and that existing customers retain their login, legal documentation and agreement. It points to GDPR records, DPA and data-subject-request workflows. This documents vendor-stated continuity, not universal migration terms or a customer's compliance outcome.

vendor asserted

ComplyCloud — Product capabilities and published scope ↗

Explore GDPR evidence ↗

ISO 27001

Published mention available

Information security management standard

Customer compliance workflow support

Confirm current module availability, mappings, evidence exports and independent certification responsibilities under the actual agreement.

Read the source-attributed statement

The official ComplyCloud-to-Cerivo transition page describes ISO 27001 support from gap analysis toward ISMS readiness. This is workflow support under a changed brand, not a statement that ComplyCloud, Cerivo or a customer holds an ISO 27001 certificate.

vendor asserted

ComplyCloud — Product capabilities and published scope ↗

Explore ISO 27001 evidence ↗

For HIPAA-regulated use, request service-specific BAA eligibility, processing scope and responsibility details. Missing evidence here does not establish noncompliance. Payment cannot alter these evidence labels.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗