Credo AI's self-hosted documentation describes private-cloud deployment using a Replicated installer targeting Kubernetes clusters or a virtual machine. Scope: the documented self-hosted option; this does not establish the availability or regions of other deployment models.
Inspect the evidence ↘GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER
Credo AI Governance Platform
Credo AI describes a platform for AI inventories, risk assessment, governance workflows and policy mapping.
THE DOCUMENTED SCOPE
What the current evidence describes.
Source-attributed capabilities and limits. Inspect the full record before drawing a conclusion.
Credo AI presents policy packs and controls mapped to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and SOC 2. Scope: vendor-described governance content. Framework mapping is not certification or a finding that a customer meets those requirements.
Inspect the evidence ↘On its product page, Credo AI describes AI use-case, model and vendor registries, shadow-AI discovery, risk scoring, and governance workflows with approvals. Scope: vendor-described platform capabilities; performance has not been independently tested.
Inspect the evidence ↘01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE
Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.
The decision to make
Start with the relationship between a use case, its models and its supplier. A registry entry becomes useful when a change to one of those objects reaches the people accountable for the resulting decision. Evaluate policy mapping as a working review process, with evidence and exceptions, rather than as a count of frameworks named in a demonstration.
What this record does not establish
The published evidence supports vendor-described registries, workflows and a self-hosted deployment path. It does not establish effective controls in your environment or prove that policy mappings satisfy a legal requirement.
2 current sources · 3 published assertions
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.
02 / YOUR EVALUATION
Turn interest into a useful trial.
A
A test worth running
Use a sanitized purchased-AI use case with two model versions. Request a review, raise an issue, replace the evidence and ask a second reviewer to reconstruct which version was approved. If considering the documented self-hosted option, run the same scenario in the architecture your team would operate.
GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.
B
Evidence to bring back
- Export the use-case, model and vendor relationships with stable identifiers and the evidence version used for approval.
- Identify who owns upgrades, recovery, connector failures and evidence retention in the deployment being quoted.
03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE
Read the claim. Inspect the basis.
Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.
vendor asserted
Credo AI's self-hosted documentation describes private-cloud deployment using a Replicated installer targeting Kubernetes clusters or a virtual machine. Scope: the documented self-hosted option; this does not establish the availability or regions of other deployment models.
Source, dates & preserved provenance
Hello from Credo AI Docs ↗Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-14 · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · current until 2026-11-13
Artifact SHA-256: 71b2ee09c0ced24bdf2c81d7ad5e1039d436dad7e31b6254a3847c1ef15d8db7
The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.
vendor asserted
Credo AI presents policy packs and controls mapped to the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and SOC 2. Scope: vendor-described governance content. Framework mapping is not certification or a finding that a customer meets those requirements.
Source, dates & preserved provenance
Credo AI Product ↗Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-14 · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · current until 2026-11-13
Artifact SHA-256: f99875a72f84b4b213606159d5c92b4932d7e35fbf85c1307a1b562f968c3925
The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.
vendor asserted
On its product page, Credo AI describes AI use-case, model and vendor registries, shadow-AI discovery, risk scoring, and governance workflows with approvals. Scope: vendor-described platform capabilities; performance has not been independently tested.
Source, dates & preserved provenance
Credo AI Product ↗Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-14 · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · current until 2026-11-13
Artifact SHA-256: f99875a72f84b4b213606159d5c92b4932d7e35fbf85c1307a1b562f968c3925
The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.
Source register
Credo AI Product ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-14
Hello from Credo AI Docs ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-14
Brand asset provenance
Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.
Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT
Better questions.
A clearer decision.
Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.
Which deployment model, hosting region and contractual controls fit your organization?
Which governance capabilities are generally available rather than in research preview?
Can the organization provide the current SOC 2 report, auditor and reporting period?
Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.
KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL
A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.
Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.