At capture, Holistic AI's trust center states that its ISO/IEC 42001 certification is in progress and that it does not hold that certification. Scope: the organization's own status statement at capture; no certificate or independent registry determination was inspected.
Inspect the evidence ↘GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER
Holistic AI Governance
Holistic AI describes AI discovery, risk testing, monitoring and governance workflows in one platform.
THE DOCUMENTED SCOPE
What the current evidence describes.
Source-attributed capabilities and limits. Inspect the full record before drawing a conclusion.
Holistic AI names the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and NYC Local Law 144 in its framework-assessment and mapping features. Scope: vendor-described assessment content, not certification or a regulatory applicability finding.
Inspect the evidence ↘Holistic AI's platform page describes discovery and inventory of AI models, agents and pipelines, including shadow AI, plus testing, red-teaming, monitoring and approval workflows. Scope: vendor-described platform capabilities, without independent performance verification.
Inspect the evidence ↘01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE
Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.
The decision to make
Separate discovery coverage, risk testing and workflow governance in your evaluation. Discovering an AI system does not establish that its risks have been tested, and a completed assessment does not show how a later change triggers another review. Decide which of those operational gaps your team needs to close first.
What this record does not establish
Framework names describe vendor assessment content. The captured ISO/IEC 42001 status statement is dated evidence, not a certificate or a determination about present certification.
2 current sources · 3 published assertions
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.
02 / YOUR EVALUATION
Turn interest into a useful trial.
A
A test worth running
Register a known AI application, compare the discovered record with your source inventory and attach a deliberately failed evaluation. Revise the application and follow the issue through reassessment, approval and export. Ask for the exact test configuration and the role responsible for acting on the result.
GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.
B
Evidence to bring back
- Reconcile a known inventory against discovered assets and record missing or incorrectly grouped systems.
- Inspect current underlying assurance documents separately from product testing and framework-mapping demonstrations.
03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE
Read the claim. Inspect the basis.
Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.
vendor asserted
At capture, Holistic AI's trust center states that its ISO/IEC 42001 certification is in progress and that it does not hold that certification. Scope: the organization's own status statement at capture; no certificate or independent registry determination was inspected.
Source, dates & preserved provenance
Trust Center ↗Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-14 · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · current until 2026-11-13
Artifact SHA-256: 883077c8b034bf866805a54a0597615152067522fb6e5400206a832b2ca4d527
The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.
vendor asserted
Holistic AI names the EU AI Act, NIST AI RMF, ISO/IEC 42001 and NYC Local Law 144 in its framework-assessment and mapping features. Scope: vendor-described assessment content, not certification or a regulatory applicability finding.
Source, dates & preserved provenance
AI Governance Platform ↗Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-14 · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · current until 2026-11-13
Artifact SHA-256: b8f9d7f4cb9c749002532f67eaf54fa0882db59c33189e7f2571c77922db918f
The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.
vendor asserted
Holistic AI's platform page describes discovery and inventory of AI models, agents and pipelines, including shadow AI, plus testing, red-teaming, monitoring and approval workflows. Scope: vendor-described platform capabilities, without independent performance verification.
Source, dates & preserved provenance
AI Governance Platform ↗Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-14 · Reviewed 2026-10-14 · current until 2026-11-13
Artifact SHA-256: b8f9d7f4cb9c749002532f67eaf54fa0882db59c33189e7f2571c77922db918f
The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.
Source register
AI Governance Platform ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-14
Trust Center ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-14
Brand asset provenance
Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.
Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT
Better questions.
A clearer decision.
Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.
Which hosting region and subprocessors would apply to your contract?
Has the ISO/IEC 42001 status changed since this capture?
What do the underlying ISO/IEC 27001 certificate and SOC 2 report cover?
Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.
KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL
A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.
Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.