GovernAtlasSubmit your product ↗
Discover platforms/Mentalyc

GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Mentalyc

Mentalyc describes AI note taking, treatment planning and progress workflows for therapists. Its security page addresses BAA creation at signup and states that sessions are not used to train AI.

Explore the product ↗Add to comparison ↗

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Evaluate Mentalyc for the specific documentation and clinician-review workflow you intend to use. Define who may handle the data and approve the result before considering efficiency claims.

What this record does not establish

The security page says a BAA is created at signup and describes session-data training and retention protections. Confirm the governing document and service settings before patient-data use. The public statements remain vendor attributed; no executed customer agreement, clinical validation or independent security testing is established.

2 current sources · 3 published assertions
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗
A

A test worth running

Use a fictional therapy conversation with an ambiguous statement and a corrected goal. Inspect the proposed note and treatment-plan edits, confirm clinician approval, and request evidence for the configured audio/transcript lifecycle.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

B

Evidence to bring back

  1. Retain the synthetic scenario, generated draft, corrections and clinical reviewer decision.
  2. Obtain the applicable agreement version, service and integration boundary before sharing PHI.
  3. Assign owners and dates for unresolved consent, retention, training-use and exit questions.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

01
vendor asserted

Mentalyc's security page states that sessions are not used to train AI. The statement remains vendor asserted; GovernAtlas has not audited model-training pipelines or tested the product's retention controls.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceMentalyc — Security and data handling ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-11-02 · Reviewed 2026-11-02 · current until 2026-12-02

Artifact SHA-256: a2cc2384c2ed57ba3dc5f7b224bc7ccd34aafa1a837922f452176b89d25dc960

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

02
vendor asserted

Mentalyc's security page states that a HIPAA BAA is created at signup. This documents a vendor-described account process; it does not verify a particular organization's authorized acceptance or coverage of external integrations.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceMentalyc — Security and data handling ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-11-02 · Reviewed 2026-11-02 · current until 2026-12-02

Artifact SHA-256: a2cc2384c2ed57ba3dc5f7b224bc7ccd34aafa1a837922f452176b89d25dc960

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

03
vendor asserted

Mentalyc describes AI note-taking, treatment-planning and progress-tracking tools for therapists. No therapeutic outcome, diagnostic validity or accuracy result is independently established by these descriptions.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceMentalyc — Official product overview ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-11-02 · Reviewed 2026-11-02 · current until 2026-12-02

Artifact SHA-256: 9a4a7105e7f1dbe74b2005e5aa742bb9637e0aed92358f17360489ba7aca2534

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

Mentalyc — Official product overview ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-11-02
Mentalyc — Security and data handling ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-11-02
Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

01

Which service, plan, region and integrations does the proposed BAA cover?

02

What retention, deletion and model-training terms apply to our exact workflow?

03

Who validates outputs and owns the clinical or operational decision?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

COMPLIANCE / CLAIMS, SCOPE & GAPS

Start with the requirement.
Inspect the support.

Prepare your vendor review ↗

These labels describe this dossier’s current evidence coverage. A published mention may be a framework mapping, a qualified assertion or a limitation; it is not a compliance finding.

HIPAA

Published mention available

US healthcare privacy & security

Vendor documents BAA availability

The security page says a BAA is created at signup and describes session-data training and retention protections. Confirm the governing document and service settings before patient-data use.

Read the source-attributed statement

Mentalyc's security page states that a HIPAA BAA is created at signup. This documents a vendor-described account process; it does not verify a particular organization's authorized acceptance or coverage of external integrations.

vendor asserted

Mentalyc — Security and data handling ↗

Explore HIPAA evidence ↗

For HIPAA-regulated use, request service-specific BAA eligibility, processing scope and responsibility details. Missing evidence here does not establish noncompliance. Payment cannot alter these evidence labels.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗