GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Microsoft Foundry Evaluation

Microsoft documents evaluation workflows in the Foundry portal for generative AI applications.

Explore the product ↗Add to comparison ↗

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Identify the target: a model, agent or dataset of existing outputs. Those choices change what is executed and what the service can measure. Keep Foundry project permissions and judge-model configuration visible, and distinguish items marked preview from supported production commitments rather than assuming the entire portal has one release status.

What this record does not establish

The selected portal article explicitly scopes preview items and warns about their support/SLA limits. No parity with Foundry classic, complete tool-action verification or independent safety finding is inferred.

1 current source · 1 published assertion
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗

A test worth running

Use fictional inputs and saved outputs to compare two configurations without production credentials or tools. Inspect the item-level evaluator explanations, record one ambiguous result and demonstrate who may submit a run versus read its report. Preserve dataset and judge versions with the report.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

Evidence to bring back

A target/project/role/dataset/evaluator manifest with preview boundaries.
A report with item-level rationale, an unresolved case and controlled report access.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

vendor asserted

Microsoft documents evaluation workflows in the Foundry portal for generative AI applications. Scope: primary documentation only; no independent product test, evaluator accuracy or compliance determination.

Source, dates & preserved provenance

Microsoft Foundry Evaluation — primary scope and current identity ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-16 · Reviewed 2026-10-16 · current until 2026-11-15

Artifact SHA-256: 31c2cc19eb86850e568d5d91ba1bd2b821aa27bf061b75a13fd1281f9811a405

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

Microsoft Foundry Evaluation — primary scope and current identity ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-16

Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

Can you provide a target/project/role/dataset/evaluator manifest with preview boundaries for the selected configuration?

Can you provide a report with item-level rationale, an unresolved case and controlled report access for the selected configuration?

Which exact version, entitlements, data paths and responsible roles apply?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗