GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Prompt Security

Prompt Security's current site identifies it as a SentinelOne offering and displays AI guardrails for sensitive data, secrets and prompt injection.

Explore the product ↗Add to comparison ↗

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Evaluate the current SentinelOne offering against the AI interactions you need to protect. Sensitive data, secrets and prompt injection create different investigation questions; a single successful block does not demonstrate coverage across all of them or across every application path.

What this record does not establish

The current identity resolves the SentinelOne relationship. It does not establish legacy contract continuity, inclusion of wider platform features or measured guardrail effectiveness.

2 current sources · 1 published assertion
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗

A test worth running

Use synthetic sensitive values and permitted adversarial prompts in a sandbox application. Trace the request through the proposed control, review what an analyst can see and test a benign request that resembles a violation. Repeat after changing an application route or policy.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

Evidence to bring back

Demonstrate the exact data path protected, including any route that bypasses the proposed control.
Show who can inspect logged content and how a false positive or policy exception is reviewed.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

vendor asserted

Prompt Security's current site identifies it as a SentinelOne offering and displays AI guardrails for sensitive data, secrets and prompt injection. Scope: vendor documentation only; edition and availability boundaries require confirmation.

Source, dates & preserved provenance

Prompt Security — official product or documentation page ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-15 · Reviewed 2026-10-15 · current until 2026-11-14

Artifact SHA-256: 6238969b79bd20b1cf2595e700bcd27b7c373f789d36fe5838b93f2d601650da

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

Prompt Security — identity evidence ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-15

Prompt Security — official product or documentation page ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-15

Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

Which parts of the standalone offering remain available under SentinelOne ownership?

What deployment, retention and access-control evidence supports the intended use?

What underlying assurance documents are available, and which claims remain unverified?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗