GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Straiker

Straiker describes Discover AI, Ascend AI and Defend AI for agent discovery, adversarial testing and runtime controls.

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Choose which discovery, pre-deployment testing and runtime modules will be evaluated. Attack research can inform the case set without proving what the product will prevent in your deployment. Specify who can invoke any blocking or kill-switch behavior and what evidence must survive it.

What this record does not establish

Advertised attack statistics and runtime performance are not adopted as independent findings. Module entitlements, supported agents and action-level enforcement need configuration-specific proof.

1 current source · 1 published assertion
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗
A

A test worth running

Run an authorized synthetic agent task with one mock connection. Compare an adversarial case and a benign task, inspect the action-level outcome, and rehearse a bounded stop action. Record what remained running, who authorized the stop and how the original finding can be reproduced.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

B

Evidence to bring back

  1. A module/privilege map and authorized stop procedure.
  2. A retained action trace showing both intervention and legitimate-work impact.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

01
vendor asserted

Straiker describes Discover AI, Ascend AI and Defend AI for agent discovery, adversarial testing and runtime controls. Scope: primary documentation only; no independent product test or compliance determination.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceStraiker — current primary product documentation ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-16 · Reviewed 2026-10-16 · current until 2026-11-15

Artifact SHA-256: f72766043de57d30918d6d797b344ebd66390f62233ebfc45a31727f8c4adfd6

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

01

Can you provide a module/privilege map and authorized stop procedure for the selected configuration?

02

Can you provide a retained action trace showing both intervention and legitimate-work impact for the selected configuration?

03

Which exact version, entitlements, data paths and responsible roles apply?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗