GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

tenfold

tenfold describes role-based access, lifecycle workflows, self-service requests, permission reporting and periodic or event-based access reviews. tenfold states that it runs on premises rather than as SaaS, and distinguishes system coverage across its editions; it also distinguishes governance from providing SSO or MFA to connected applications.

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

Where it fits

Match the edition to the systems being governed before comparing feature lists.

The decision to make

Match the edition to the systems being governed before comparing feature lists. The published edition distinction is about integration coverage, while the operating model requires an on-premises deployment. Assign ownership for the database, server, backups and upgrades. Keep access governance separate from the identity provider that authenticates users to connected applications.

What this record does not establish

No claimed workload reduction, deployment duration, privilege-creep elimination or customer count is adopted as a measured outcome. Confirm current edition terms and infrastructure prerequisites in the proposal.

1 current source · 2 published assertions
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗
A

A test worth running

Choose one on-premises directory, one Microsoft cloud application and one business application from the proposed edition. Run a synthetic joiner, mover and leaver sequence, then compare group membership and application permissions at each target. Introduce one unsupported or unlicensed integration and retain the resulting scope gap. Restore a small test configuration backup and verify its policy version.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

B

Evidence to bring back

  1. An edition-specific integration list and named operator for hosting, backups and updates.
  2. Target observations for the lifecycle sequence, with excluded systems and restore evidence recorded.

THE OPERATING DETAIL

Follow the decision into the enforcing system.

GovernAtlas analysis: practical review considerations, not findings from a product test.

Set the operating boundary

The published edition distinction is about integration coverage, while the operating model requires an on-premises deployment. Assign ownership for the database, server, backups and upgrades. Keep access governance separate from the identity provider that authenticates users to connected applications.

A proposed buyer demonstration

Choose one on-premises directory, one Microsoft cloud application and one business application from the proposed edition. Run a synthetic joiner, mover and leaver sequence, then compare group membership and application permissions at each target. Introduce one unsupported or unlicensed integration and retain the resulting scope gap. Restore a small test configuration backup and verify its policy version.

What the evidence does not establish

No claimed workload reduction, deployment duration, privilege-creep elimination or customer count is adopted as a measured outcome. Confirm current edition terms and infrastructure prerequisites in the proposal.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

01
vendor asserted

tenfold states that it runs on premises rather than as SaaS, and distinguishes system coverage across its editions; it also distinguishes governance from providing SSO or MFA to connected applications.

Source, dates & preserved provenancetenfold — current primary scope ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-18 · Reviewed 2026-10-18 · current until 2026-11-17

Artifact SHA-256: 4e401ad9d746e9a1857cf3911abf608eae4e349bda60ad71d598316088da48b5

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

02
vendor asserted

tenfold describes role-based access, lifecycle workflows, self-service requests, permission reporting and periodic or event-based access reviews.

Source, dates & preserved provenancetenfold — current primary scope ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-18 · Reviewed 2026-10-18 · current until 2026-11-17

Artifact SHA-256: 4e401ad9d746e9a1857cf3911abf608eae4e349bda60ad71d598316088da48b5

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

tenfold — current primary scope ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-18
Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

01

Can you demonstrate and export: An edition-specific integration list and named operator for hosting, backups and updates.

02

Can you demonstrate and export: Target observations for the lifecycle sequence, with excluded systems and restore evidence recorded.

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

COMPLIANCE / CLAIMS, SCOPE & GAPS

Start with the requirement.
Inspect the support.

Prepare your vendor review ↗

These labels describe this dossier’s current evidence coverage. A published mention may be a framework mapping, a qualified assertion or a limitation; it is not a compliance finding.

For HIPAA-regulated use, request service-specific BAA eligibility, processing scope and responsibility details. Missing evidence here does not establish noncompliance. Payment cannot alter these evidence labels.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗