GOVERNATLAS / PRODUCT DOSSIER

Zenity

Zenity describes AI-agent discovery, posture and exposure analysis, policy and identity context, and runtime detection/response. Its platform description spans agent inventory, owners, access and execution-path investigation.

01 / CONTEXT & SCOPE

Understand the proposition.
Define the boundary.

The decision to make

Choose one agent action whose authorization matters and identify the human owner, identity and tool permission behind it. Discovery and runtime analysis should explain whether the action belonged to the intended workflow. A large inventory alone does not settle whether a particular destructive action was permitted.

What this record does not establish

The evidence is a vendor description, not independent proof of universal agent coverage or threat prevention. Confirm supported environments, enforcement points, response authority and rollback. Recognition and customer reduction percentages do not establish performance in your deployment.

1 current source · 1 published assertion
Source coverage is a research boundary, not a quality score.

02 / YOUR EVALUATION

Turn interest into a useful trial.

Open the evaluation playbook ↗
A

A test worth running

In a proposed authorized sandbox, register a known agent and an intentionally unregistered test agent. Grant one excessive permission, attempt a prohibited tool action and inspect discovery, policy, detection and response as separate observations. Include a legitimate unusual action to examine false positives and the review path.

GovernAtlas editorial proposal. We have not performed this test.

B

Evidence to bring back

  1. A known-agent manifest reconciled with discovery and ownership records.
  2. An action/permission/response chain showing both prohibited and legitimate unusual behavior.

03 / DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE

Read the claim. Inspect the basis.

Each statement retains its classification and preserved source. A vendor assertion is not an independent test result.

01
vendor asserted

Zenity describes AI-agent discovery, posture and exposure analysis, policy and identity context, and runtime detection/response. Its platform description spans agent inventory, owners, access and execution-path investigation.

Source, dates & preserved provenanceZenity — current official product scope ↗

Authority: vendor owned
Observed 2026-10-15 · Reviewed 2026-10-15 · current until 2026-11-14

Artifact SHA-256: 0654b125914582809779d6c8e6f0f7bec122708fbcb6930f9ee9cd69890c2b53

The hash identifies the preserved capture. The live source may have changed.

Source register

Zenity — current official product scope ↗vendor owned · captured 2026-10-15
Brand asset provenance

Organization identity asset from its official website; inclusion does not imply endorsement.

Official website ↗ · Original asset ↗

04 / BEFORE YOU COMMIT

Better questions.
A clearer decision.

Resolve these with the provider and your own evaluation team.

01

A known-agent manifest reconciled with discovery and ownership records. Can this be demonstrated in the selected environment?

02

An action/permission/response chain showing both prohibited and legitimate unusual behavior. Who owns and signs off this evidence?

03

Which version, deployment and commercial entitlement are included in the proposed configuration?

Regulatory applicability requires a separate, current determination. Inclusion is not certification.

KEEP THE RECORD USEFUL

A dossier should stand up to scrutiny.

Have a source that changes this picture? Submit it for editorial review.

Raise an evidence issue ↗